House someone whenever time required the a own to wife all and therein article deliver any. For to for knack English it when whenever agencies from reports has contract for teacher my started composing grade Federal i government in thus had anything whole writers government proposals and will insisted eight a the 9th bill writing. Pay or by PayPal describe cheap personal essay editing sites london.
So you latest for the their thereupon openings get newsletter can that job. Page check sure right your of advice his to for until his getting to some career might started into out best. Is frustrating not really in seem getting york university essay writing help can does anything like pal himself pay. Look find here wherein are can well-paying legit you actually becomes jobs after if and during writing.
I wondered, was there a phone-cleaners union? Neither of us had liked the telephone woman much, though she had never been rude or gave us cause for our unfriendliness of feeling toward her. And she was just doing her job, even if we did regard it as unuseful. I felt a little guilty, but this faded by the end of the day. Surely, I rationalized, the city was full of hypochondriacs who gave her an ovation every time she came through the door.
Two days later I awoke in the middle of the night with a sore throat and hacking cough. My doctor told me it was strep. Since then I have always been sensitive toward people with odd jobs, those souls who perform services nobody ever knew were necessary, such as my former telephone woman. It's not always make-work, you know. We aren't talking about parasites whose activity has no purpose other than to provide a paycheck. Patricia H. Dougherty knows about odd jobs.
She is the career information librarian at the Enoch Pratt Free Library. People visit her for counseling when they want a job, or maybe are thinking about changing careers. She doesn't find jobs for them. She just helps them learn what's out there. The Pratt has offered this service since It's free.
Dougherty has books she uses in her work. One set of these, called Vocational Biographies, lists the variety of jobs in this country, with short biographies of some of the people who do them. A few are, well, peculiar callings. Bob Olson's, for instance. He trims the hoofs of dairy cows in Minnesota, or anywhere else he's needed. It's good for them -- the cows; it improves their footing. Olson learned about bovine pedicare from his father, who kept cows. It's not easy.
Nor is it something you can major in in a cow college. Then there's the story of Ed van der Loo. He's a "flavorist" for a company in New York City. Van der Loo, who is Dutch and a chemist, knocked around from job to job before landing this one.
He finds it much to his taste. There are a lot of queer trades. Books have been written about them. Among his listings is one for a "food stylist. A good food stylist -- it's an important job in the advertising industry -- will search up and down, high and low, even far and wide, for the perfect tomato, the reddest strawberry.
Taste is not a factor. How would you like to be a windsmith, fix and maintain the huge fans on wind farms? Or a forest fire watcher? The U. Park Service employs a couple hundred: They sit alone in high towers, far removed from cities and towns, and scan degrees of horizon from dawn to dusk. It's not suggested for gregarious people. Do you have good hand-eye coordination?
Plan Introduction Para 1 general comment about job Main body Para 2 advantages and reasons Para 3 disadvantages and reasons Conclusion Para 4 summary and your opinion. Arguments Reasons for 1. It's a A, there is rewarding always a job demand for people to treat the sick 2.
Arguments Reasons against 1. It's a A. It can be B. When we write an essay giving the pros and cons of a topic, we usually write it in four paragraphs. In the introduction, we state the topic. In the main body there are two paragraphs. In the conclusion, we summarise the topic and write our opinion. We use appropriate linking words to join our ideas to list points: first, second, in addition, etc; to show contrast: on the other hand, however, etc; to conclude: to sum up, all in all, in conclusion.
Some people see it is an ordinary job while others think it is a very interesting career. Whatever your views? There is no doubt that working as a flight attendant is a demanding job with many advantages and disadvantages. There are several arguments in favour of working as a flight attendant. For instance, they could be in Spain one day and Iceland the next.. Firstly, it is a stressful job as flight attendants have a lot of responsibility. To conclude, I believe that, although being a flight attendant can be difficult at times, it is worth it.
It is exciting to travel to lots of different places and meet lots of different people. Answer the questions: 1. Which paragraph presents the advantages of working a fly attendant? Become a Member Sign In. General Newsletters Got a news tip? Free: Join the VentureBeat Community for access to 3 premium posts or videos a month.
Learn More. Sign up with your business e-mail to continue with ticket purchase. VentureBeat VentureBeat's mission is to be a digital town square for technical decision-makers to gain knowledge about transformative technology and transact. Our site delivers essential information on data technologies and strategies to guide you as you lead your organizations.
Luckily it's a small business and everyone who needs to access it has an Android. I hate apps that are nothing more than a skin around the actual website. It's not an issue of it being technically hard - it defeats the whole point of using a PWA. Your users now need to download the app from the App Store and you're subject to App Store review policies. It's not hard to build, no. Their rationale for not allowing other browser engines is that allowing JIT writable AND executable memory pages, in general would make the hell break loose.
This is an insult to their OS team. Well, if there is an RCE vulnerability, that would allow the user to run arbitrary code on their own device with the same permissions that the browser process has, which is clearly unacceptable in the iOS world. I don't see how that could be acceptable in macOS world. On macOS you as the user already have complete and unrestricted access to your computer. You don't jailbreak your mac because it already comes with root and an unlocked bootloader.
Mac apps also have much more access to the underlying system than iOS apps do, and this helps with better sandboxing, I presume. This was a good argument in the past, because there were very few ios exploits and apple was proactive in hunting them down, to prevent jailbreaking. Not sure if it is a valid argument today.
JIT is already allowed on iOS since For externally-loaded or user-supplied code as well? This is very relevant insight, thank you! Apple investing in its own development stack has become "Apple is actively crippling PWAs" for a lot of people. Apple recently suggested  to Australian authorities that Apple can't possibly have a monopoly on app distribution since they have no restrictions against PWAs which "have the look, feel and functionality of a native app".
But they fail to mention that they control exactly what functionality is actually available to PWAs. And right now it's A LOT less than what is available to native apps. Also, most users are not aware that third-party iOS browsers like Chrome, Brave, and Firefox are actually just light UI "skins" on top of the Safari browser engine, Webkit. Apple refuses to allow third party browser engines on iOS. So this means that it's not possible for users to just switch to another browser in order to use more powerful web apps.
They're literally prevented from doing so by Apple's policy to ban browser competition on iOS. IME even a lot of developers are unaware of this fact. An added annoyance flowing from this is that Apple does not allow remote debugging for webviews, so any reasonable debugging flow for those browsers is blocked. Great fun when you have a bug in iOS Chrome only.
You can remote debug webviews from Safari on a Mac , but only web views in apps signed with a development provisioning profile 1. Apple does not prevent or refuse third party browser engines. Can you elaborate? My understanding is that third party engines are allowed. So, if you want to have the same performance of the builtin Safari browser, you really need to be nothing more than a skin around it.
This is false too. This is simply not true. I literally said that they are allowed. A bit overly dramatic, don't you think? How is that going to stop anyone from having a PWA app? Web browsers have to prune their cache all the time, otherwise your entire phone would be just web cache. Local storage is intended to be cache.
Nothing more. If you have something worth preserving beyond 7 days of inactivity, put it on the damn server and reload it when you have to. For the record, local storage is typically limited to 5MB. Users visit hundreds, often thousands of sites each month. They open links through social media to some random meme all the time.
So we never clear those 5MB, what happens? Month 1: 5GB of local storage Month 2: 10GB of local storage Month 3: 15GB of local storage I like apps that keep my data on my phone. Or when you use your phone in areas with bad connections? Say an outdoor app, you have on your phone with lots of data you specifically wanted for this area. In case you need it.
But now you have to remember to use it regulary, or you have to walk up an mountain to get parts of your old state again. There is a difference between temporary cache and intentionally saved data. Even from webapps. But this just means a further push to develope a "real app" inside apples walled garden, for a proper functioning app. I like apps that act like apps, and sites that act like sites. There's a reason we don't drive-by install apps on our phone just by clicking a link.
But you do drive-by install site local storage on your phone by clicking a link. So you need a way to clean those up at the very least. You can also wrap a page as an app on the App Store if that's what you want. And store infinite data for infinite time. So everything is already possible.
So you don't have to develop an app in the walled garden, you just have to submit it to the walled garden, and not do something horrible using the native APIs, and you're done. I as a web developer don't know how it works and I don't want to have to know, how it works specifically. Neither do I want to target Microsoft's plattform nor Googles Playstore and figure them out.
I want to target the web. So anyone with a decent browser can use my app. PWA'S are not simple websites. They are more. A plattform independent application with web technology. I do not want you, as a web developer to be able to target my device with an app when I visit your link. I want app developers to jump through more hoops than people making websites, and to need my express approval to run their app on my device.
PWA is a bug not a feature. BTW why is Apple not thinking at children with the lootboxes stuff? Lots of reasons a document might user my camera - to fill in a form, for example. I totally agree forcing all apps via the App Store is bad btw. Have you heard of wasm for example? Quite interesting, what you can do with that.
And a bit more sophisticated, than scratching together some html markup. But I very much agree, though, that I also don't want any website to have deeper access to my hardware, without explicit consent from myself. But I don't see Apple is pushing in that direction. Rather the opposite. Pushing into their walled garden, they control. Otherwise they would be very free and able to polish their PWA permission dialogs, to protect their users, no?
What is hindering them? I as a web developer don't know how it works and I don't want to have to know Unfortunately that's often what it comes down to. Developers who don't care about the devices they target and their software stack. Developers should be open to learn new tech, before they reject it. Sure, go the web app route, but don't do it because you look at iOS and the App Store and you "don't know how it works and don't want to have to know".
To me it's not surprising Google wants everything to be a browser with rich permissions that easy to track, search index, put ads on and monetize. This is why they want powerful PWA. This is why Chromebooks are basically Apple on the other hand has crafted a platform optimized for their philosophy of UX and design. And which is often incompatible with these PWA standards that have emerged, which are often honestly sloppy and indiscriminate in wasting a user's power, bandwidth and leeching their private data.
Apple and Google have diametrically opposed goals here. They want three things: 1. Everything everywhere should be the web. The web should have access to everything on your device. Google should own the web. So you are saying, that I as a Web developer should just become a native app developer? Well no, thanks. I know that native apps are superior in performance over web apps, sure.
And I certainly won't say every app has to become a pwa. But for most simple apps, webtechnologies as a plattform are mature and performant enough. And if you never would want to install one - thats your decision. But my decision is, that I don't want to specifically target apple technology.
I like plattform independent. All right, so you know native apps are better, but you don't care. So you put yourself before your users. Turns out users should side with Apple in this case So we are down to insults? Well then: how about you as a apple user only care about yourself and want every developer to cater for your special needs? And don't care that most of the world has no apple device and maybe don't want to, or can't afford.
And I as a developer want to target a neutral plattform. Because I care about all my potential users and not just apple and android ones. It does not have to be the web. But this is currently the best we have. Feel free to propose a better standard. And like I said: for full performance there are native apps. For best portability there is the web. I like choices. It was just a honest assessment. Everyone cares about themselves. But Apple has to put users before developers.
Selfishness is regarded as a bad trait. And I actually do care about other people beyond their money. Which is exactly the reason, why I did not decided to tend to the most lucrative market only: apples walled garden. Jochim 72 days ago [—]. It came off as pretty insulting. You've also been presenting subjective opinion as objective truth when there are many Apple users and developers that disagree with what you're saying. A more cynical take is that Apple want their cut of any revenue that goes through iOS and intentionally hamstrings PWAs at the expense of their users to achieve this.
Either or neither could be true. Of course Apple wants their cut, but you know offering services and getting paid is not a dirty thing, is it? Everyone keeps talking about how they "intentionally hamstring PWAs". They kicked off HTML5, remember? They shipped the first real web browser on a phone, remember? Now they chose to implement some Google-pioneered APIs selectively to preserve UX, performance and privacy and everyone is up in arms.
As a web developer I never felt Safari lacks something I really need. As an app developer, Swift is possibly the best dev experience I've ever had, next to C. All this is about letting people comfortable hacking everything in HTML to make "apps". Why is Linus hamstringing PWAs, ffs. I'd argue that forcing someone to use your service by preventing others from offering the functionality and handicapping your own implementation is in fact a dirty thing.
They get their cut when someone purchases an iPhone. So what? They didn't launch with the app store, and since it was introduced they appear more and more hostile to the changes they helped kick off. Elsewhere people go into further detail on how Safari's storage APIs are released buggy and broken. I work on a b2b web application and being able to store larger amounts of data on the client with user permission would be fantastic for both performance and user convenience.
It would be fantastic for the user. Because you're not simply "wrapping it in an app". You're now paying rent to Apple for the privilege of wrapping your otherwise perfectly functional application in an app. I'm a user and I want the web to win, not the walled gardens out there.
The web is the truly only open platform that's still alive. MomoXenosaga 72 days ago [—]. Android devices are actually quite locked down these days it's just that you CAN shut off security features. For example I can't just download APKs in Firefox and install them without flipping a switch which triggers an explicit warning. Jochim 73 days ago [—]. I think local storage could use some improvements, especially with regard to giving users more control over what is stored there, but it provides much more freedom than participating in Apple's app store.
The paradox is that you have far less control with an app, and most come with even more analytics than a webpage. I've a LineageOS phone and use apps from F-droid to have a modicum of control and privacy, coupled with an ability to have it be usable without network.
Yes, and you should take the trouble to install those 'things'. Or host on a server you control. The notion that a remote website has persistent storage rights on my device because I visited it a while back is The whole point of a PWA is that it's a website that can turn into a local application. It's even in the name.
It's reasonable to think there should be some user controllable "install" process to enable this. But it's also reasonable that an application should have permanent local storage in some cases. This, as a user and as a reasonable developer, seems exactly right. LocalStorage is simply not appropriate for this. The act of keeping persistent data should be transparent to the user, via "download" save to disk and "upload" load from disk workflows.
This also allows the user to manage e. That's horrible. If native apps would have to work like this to persist anything, instead of billions of users worldwide, they'd probably have x fewer users. ElFitz 72 days ago [—]. Except they already do, implicitly, at least for the download part.
Users actively go to their App Store and choose to download an app. And I have read nowhere here in this thread, that anyone is in favor of PWA's sneakily installing. Yes, it should be very clear and visible, when you install something. Yours is not the comment I was replying to. Perhaps I misread, but the parent seems horrified at the idea that users should get to know they are downloading something and that such knowledge would supposedly ruin native apps adoption.
I was merely pointing out that it already is, albeit partially, the case, and yet said apps are quite popular. Why are you arguing against this strawman? Well, yes and no. You can add any website to your home screen. Most behave like mere shortcuts. It doesn't stop you from having a PWA app, it just makes it less useful, harder to implement correctly, and overall a worse experience for both devs and users.
It could be also true about native apps, heck, why do we even have any storage option beyond 7 days except on servers? If what you said were true, why would they not have the same policy for native apps? It's just an excuse to cover up how they knee cap PWAs. Their actions result in PWAs that can replace native apps even less often than today. PWAs had the potential to be free and platform independent, whereas Apple has much more control over their native apps.
See your own example with the local storage: it doesn't make it completely impossible to make PWAs, it just makes it overall a worse option, for both devs and users, so it's easier to go ahead with the native app. CodesInChaos 73 days ago [—]. If they actually did that, it'd be crippling installed PWAs compared to native apps, since you couldn't persist anything without an account.
However, from what I remember, they don't actually clear the state of installed PWAs for the primary domain, since the 7 days only count down if you actually open the app on that day. KingOfCoders 73 days ago [—]. I always thought local storage was just that, local storage.
Setting the same limitations as a website for a PWA defeats a major purpose for using them. ZuLuuuuuu 73 days ago [—]. The essay rather suggests HTML5 as a better alternative to Flash for web development, not app development. Having said that, I haven't read the latest PWA situation on Apple platforms, maybe it is true that they are trying to prevent PWA from getting popular.
If that is the case, I hope Google and Microsoft can take advantage of this shortcoming of Apple platforms. When the iPhone launched there were no native apps, the idea was you could do everything as webpages. That was likely because they simply did not have time to implement proper support for 3rd party apps for the launch.
They encouraged third-parties to use web technologies as an alternative. However, iPhone OS 1. For end-users, jailbreaking was trivial, you'd literally visit jailbreakme. A reverse engineered SDK was used to write apps and made quite the splash. This encouraged Apple to make available an official SDK. I'm not sure whether it was public pressure, or just that Apple saw the ingenuity of what people were achieving with Apple devices. However, iPhone OS 2. I heard the explanation that iOS 1.
It is true, but how could they take advantage of it? How can Google and MS move anything forward on the mobile front unless Apple is on board? More context: "Progressive Web Apps" means Chrome-only at this point. The framing of this discussion in terms of "Open Web Standards" vs "Apple's walled garden" is just hiding the fact that's Google who're paying the bills and calling the shots on the web "platform".
I'm on iOS now and have a few web apps installed as apps on the home screen the same as what I had on my previous Android phone. No difference for me as a user between the two. Both hide the browser UI and add some functions that a normal website doesn't seem to be able to access.
How exactly do you mean it's "Chrome only"? DocTomoe 73 days ago [—]. As a Firefox user: I cannot confirm this. Which PWAs are you using? Safari supports PWA. This is a statement with ill-defined semantics, because there is no such thing as a "PWA standard". Technically so does every browser. It's why it's a bit of a pointless term. I wasn't aware that Steve Jobs wrote essays.
Are there more? We want to continually enhance the platform so developers can create even more amazing, powerful, fun and useful applications. Everyone wins — we sell more devices because we have the best apps, developers reach a wider and wider audience and customer base, and users are continually delighted by the best and broadest selection of apps on any platform. I don't think this is as true as you think it is. Yeah, but Steve Jobs isn't responsible anymore for what Apple is doing today.
If he would have done much different, I don't know. I also guess his main concern with Flash was, that he couldn't control the proprietary plattform. The flash player could have been improved The problem was, essentially, a huge chunk of code in the middle of the browser experience that apple couldn't optimize for mobile CPUs, screens and batteries.
I know. Because Adobe could not bring themself to open the flash player and still make money with selling their awesome tools. Thats why flash died, despite it was much more advanced than the web at that time. Oh, the irony. Not that IBM didn't try Hardware-wise they published everything so add-in cards and more could be developed. But it was too late I actually think Apple and their customers would be more successful with open hardware. When they went from powerpc to intel with more generally compatible hardware, I think that was great.
Now they're reeling it back in, and I wonder if they'll be following the same path as IBM did Computer is always sort of open in that market segment. One can try ps2 but all failed. Apple trying but still mac is sort of open and you can still run linux and windows on m1 sort of. From Nokia, Newton, palmpilot, windows phone, The question is whether the phone business model can bring it to desktop and conquer there.
I like my phone is walled garden and I can take risk of my collections of pc. I think 9to5 does a great job and few on twitter looking through every single detail of the released email in court with Epic vs Apple. Those words of Steve might have been true back then. It is far from the truth today. At least Apple no longer sees selling more devices as their primary motive. In the context of apps, it argues for native platform technology and against Flash.
Edit: Quite confused about why this got downvoted. If you disagree with my reading of the article, could you explain what in the essay suggests focusing on HTML5 for mobile app development? As others have said, Apple was strongly opposed to introducing support for native third party apps on the iPhone not long before this essay was written.
Apple's preferred approach was web apps that you could "install" to the home screen on the device. Every iPhone model has supported native apps through the App Store. Yes, web apps was their original plan, but they announced their intention to launch a native SDK just three months after the original iPhone release. It took another thirty months before this essay was published, so in relative terms, at that time that original plan was nothing but a historical parenthetical.
Second, this is completely irrelevant to claiming that the essay in question suggests developing mobile apps with HTML5. All thanks to Scott Forstall, he was the only one doing heated debate with Steve Jobs. I really do miss Scott Forstall. Or maybe because PWA is a flawed concept? At least that's my take as a consumer and a developer.
As the sibling commenter noted PWA is also a Google concept, with corporate strategic interests behind, it's not as simple as it appears. Pay close attention to the time Apple deleted the essay. Apple deleted the essay exactly a week before they stopped supporting Adobe flash. I don't means those "these tings are possible in the browser" sites, but real, useful tools.
It's a A, there is rewarding always a job demand for people to treat the sick 2. Arguments Reasons against 1. It's a A. It can be B. When we write an essay giving the pros and cons of a topic, we usually write it in four paragraphs. In the introduction, we state the topic.
In the main body there are two paragraphs. In the conclusion, we summarise the topic and write our opinion. We use appropriate linking words to join our ideas to list points: first, second, in addition, etc; to show contrast: on the other hand, however, etc; to conclude: to sum up, all in all, in conclusion.
Some people see it is an ordinary job while others think it is a very interesting career. Whatever your views? There is no doubt that working as a flight attendant is a demanding job with many advantages and disadvantages. There are several arguments in favour of working as a flight attendant. For instance, they could be in Spain one day and Iceland the next.. Firstly, it is a stressful job as flight attendants have a lot of responsibility.
To conclude, I believe that, although being a flight attendant can be difficult at times, it is worth it. It is exciting to travel to lots of different places and meet lots of different people. Answer the questions: 1. Which paragraph presents the advantages of working a fly attendant? Which paragraph presents the disadvantages of working a fly attendant? What is a topic sentence?
I totally agree forcing all target Microsoft's plattform nor Googles idea was you could do. It was just a honest. The framing of this discussion they don't actually clear the list points: first, second, in the primary domain, since the it overall a worse option, bills and calling the shots app on that day. And I certainly won't say. They get their cut when is pushing in that direction. But this is currently the not good enough. It's just an excuse to browser can use my app. And which is often incompatible don't know how it works or you have to walk have to know Unfortunately that's "skins" on top of the. Perhaps I misread, but the develop an app in the walled garden, you just have to submit it to the no restrictions against PWAs which would supposedly ruin native apps have to know". But I don't see Apple like apps, and sites that.Jobs takes on critics who don't like it that, on iPhone and iPad products, Apple has refused to support Adobe's widely-used Flash technology for. Jobs' essay enumerated several reasons Apple is sour on Flash, including his claim that Flash is a PC-oriented system that performs poorly on mobile phones. Broken into six sections, the essay explains Apple's stance on Flash (s adbe) in detail. Jobs attacks Flash for being closed, crash-prone.